The Beatles ... Mono Box

By -
I would be a liar if I claimed that we didn't love the Beatles catalog.  We have a large collection of pressings on vinyl, the stereo and mono CD sets released a few years ago, and they are in regular rotation.  Their music is timeless, and the enjoyment spans the generations in our house.

The Beatles were late to the digital game, and only recently allowed their taped to be converted to digital.  After lengthy legal negotiations with all the estates and remaining band members, they ripped the tapes to 24/192, but for some reason, only 24/44.1 downsampled has seen the light of day. 

Now we own and love the stereo box set.  Given the difficulty of locating an affordable copy of a quality pressing of their stereo albums, this was a godsend to many.  But ... purists complained (they always do!) that since it was rumored to have been mastered from those 24bit/44.1kHz digital files - the Vinyl fell short of expectations.  We had hoped the release would be a last word on fidelity, and it certinaly isn't it, but it is far preferable to a worn out abused piece of used vinyl.

But for someone seeking the best something can be ...

Recently, though, the Mono box, which is publishing a perfectionist all analog chain mastering stream from the tapes to a new high quality pressing.  Given that the mono releases for most of their catalog were the ones the engineers, at the time of the recording, sweated over, if you had to pick one ... this was the one!

We got ours in within a week of it's release, and for our favorite albums, Rubber Soul, Revolver, Sgt Pepper and Magical Mystery Tour  this was truly a sonic breakthrough only obtainable with exotic, expensive hard-to-find special pressings.

For those that know the stereo mix by heart, you will notice some minor differences, but the sound quality is first rate, and we highly recommend them to not only Beatles fans, but even casual fans - this is the one you want!

Check it out.

Comments

  1. regnaD kciNOctober 17, 2014 at 2:45 AM

    A correction: the 2009 digital transfers were made at a full 24/192. However, Apple/the surviving Beatles/whoever have only allowed downsampled 44.1 versions to be sold. Hopefully, that will change in the future.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Bromo33333October 17, 2014 at 2:07 PM

      Thanks for the correction! I'll note it above.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Thorens MM002 and MM008 meet the Crosley C10 (Part 2 of 2)

By -
Image
It used to be that every single receiver or preamp had a built in phonostage.  The way it used to work is that you would by a turntable, plug it in, and start spinning records.  For the audio enthusiast, there was always low output moving coil cartridges, and the resultant step-up-transformer you could use to present a signal to the phono input, but the built in was always used.  When the CD came to dominate, that the good 'ol built-in phono input went away.  A minor proliferation of external phono stages began as analog declined, but it left the mass market's consciousness as the silver disc rose in domination.  Given the people sticking to their vinyl through the near death of the medium were mostly performance oriented enthusiasts.  The state of the art playback for analog rose considerably (both in performance and price) during this dark time.  Now that vinyl is beginning to flirt with becoming mainstream again, brands are introducing their own tables and phono stages aime
Read more

Full Rez Streaming: Deezer Elite, Murfie and TIDAL on Sonos

By -
Image
We were looking over the end of year reports from the RIAA and others, and one thing is clear - the traditional CD album - is in decline, and streaming services are on the rise.  We have been on the tip of that wave - being longtime subscribers to Pandora, Spotify, and others - and are happy with them.  The one thing that has stopped them for being anything other than a casual/background listen is the compressed nature always fell short of spinning a CD, or even playing a FLAC file for musical enjoyment.  The holy grail, in our book, would be a high resolution streaming service (preferably something on the order of 24/96) that could give us a reliable, high quality sound that wouldn't sound like a compromise for convenience's sake. But streaming services c2013 weren't there.  Even at the highest offered rate of 320kbps, there was a small amount of lost ambience and detail compared to a silver disc spun in our CD player (not to even broach the subject of an LP which would
Read more

The Quad 2805 Review Part1: The Anticipation

By -
Image
In an earlier post, I went on and on and on (and on)  about the tremendous crush I have on the Quad ESL.  I droned on about the history of this hard-to-live-with but highly regarded speaker.  I even went so far as outlining all of its faults and foibles, and how I was able to look past them in my mental fantasy of them and still like the idea of the speaker. Quad c1960 ... note the lack of man-cave And I realized like a stormy relationship, it might never work.  And it might never be compatible with our idea that every family member should be part of the fun given it's narrow "sweet spot*" and fragility. I would love to take a test drive someday of the originals, but I think in my heart of hearts, the later version would be the easier one to live with ... *The so-called sweet spot is the small place, usually making an equilateral triangle with the speakers where you get the best sounding tonal balance and stereo effects.  In some speakers it is large, say the si
Read more